On November 1, 2018, Enterprise Services, LLC changed its name to Perspecta Enterprise Solutions LLC. ES challenges numerous aspects of the evaluation of its proposal and the agency's best-value award determination. ES further argues that the evaluation findings were “utterly unsupported.”  Id. and Enterprise Services LLC filed as a Domestic Limited-Liability Company in the State of Nevada and is no longer active.This corporate entity was filed approximately six years ago on Tuesday, July 21, 2015 , according to public records filed with Nevada Secretary of State. See id. NJ private investigators specializing in surveillance. In this regard, we agree with both of the agency’s analogies:  the protester is mixing apples and oranges, and attempting to place a square peg in a round hole. 16, 2015, 2015 CPD ¶ 108 at 7; Walton Constr.--a CORE Co., LLC, B‑407621, B‑407621.2, Jan. 10, 2013, 2013 CPD ¶ 29 at 6 (no requirement to monetize features of competing proposals); Structural Pres. This redacted version has been approved for public release. at 4. at 4-8. See, e.g., Glenn Def. The solicitation here, issued on January 22, 2016, sought proposals for the RIS I contract, which encompassed NSA/CSS users in the [DELETED] zone and the [DELETED] zone. COS at 12, 16. See, e.g., Computer World Servs. Protester’s Response to NSA Req. Enterprise services architecture generally includes high-level components and principles of object-oriented design employed to match the current heterogeneous world of IT architecture. Enterprise Solutions LLC specializes in the construction and design of electrical systems for intuitional, commercial, industrial and service projects of all types and sizes. 8595. Elite Enterprise Services, LLC has 5 total employees across all of its locations and generates $2.00 million in sales (USD). The GREENWAY program is divided into two functional areas of responsibility:  Global Enterprise Services (GES), which focuses on services provisioned on a global scale and more virtual in nature; and the Regional Infrastructure Services (RIS) component, which provides services more localized and physical in nature and provisioned at specific zones throughout the world. Thus, the SSAC advised that AT&T’s proposal represented the best value to the government, and recommended award to AT&T. AR, Tab 11, RFP, at 1; PWS at 2. Given the “significant and substantial reliance” on Hewlett Packard’s corporate resources, the agency maintains that any standalone successor in interest would be unable to perform the contract in the manner proposed. We discuss some illustrative examples below.[12]. Here, we disagree with the protester that this alone reflects any discrepancy or shows that the evaluators’ findings were inconsistent with the rating definitions. The RFP contemplated the award of an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract under which the agency could issue task orders on either a fixed-priced (with or without award fee), cost-reimbursable (with or without award or fixed fee), or time-and-materials basis. at 4-5. Id. In this respect, ES’s arguments reflect the protester’s view of the merits of its proposal, but do not demonstrate an improper evaluation. We are a freight brokerage company that specializes in car hauling. [10]  The protester asserts that NSA ignored aspects of its proposed solutions, improperly assigned weaknesses and risks, and/or misapplied the rating scheme outlined in the RFP. Let us customize an affordable help desk or service desk solution for your organization. Indeed, as discussed above, the contemporaneous record shows that the offeror proposed an acceptable approach to perform the RIS I services. Founded -- Incorporated ; Annual Revenue --Employee Count 15; Industries Retail - Computer Software … See, e.g., Leidos Innovations Corp., B‑414289.2, June 6, 2017, 2017 CPD ¶ 200 at 4 (finding protester to be an interested party to challenge the issuance of a task order where the protester was the successor in interest to the entity awarded the IDIQ contract and a novation agreement had been completed); SRA Int’l, Inc.; NTT DATA Servs. See id. Enterprise Logistic Services LLC filed as a Domestic Limited Liability Company (LLC) in the State of Texas on Monday, September 27, 2010 and is approximately eleven years old, according to public records filed with Texas Secretary of State. Therefore, I have determined that the significant benefits of AT&T’s proposal . Enterprise Cyber Security, including Information Assurance (IA) Risk Assessment (IA, Acquisition, and Program) Web Design /Development IT, Cloud and Telecom Services. at 11. PALLETS DELIVERED WEEKLY. It added new team members and took a deeper look at diversity and inclusion across the company. The weakness at issue was assigned under the failover and data replication criterion, which focused on an offeror’s processes and procedures when a critical infrastructure fails. ES’s complaint reflects its disagreement with the agency’s conclusions but does not demonstrate an unreasonable evaluation. I, Executive Summary, at I-1; see also id., Tab 1, HPES Proposal, Cover Letter, at 1 (“HP Enterprise Services, LLC (HPES) is pleased to submit our proposal in response to the GREENWAY [RIS I] effort”). In reviewing protests of an agency’s evaluation, our Office does not reevaluate proposals; rather, we review the record to determine if the evaluation was reasonable, consistent with the solicitation’s evaluation scheme, as well as procurement statutes and regulations, and adequately documented. A, Mission Assurance Plan, at II.A-17-II.A-18. [9]  On this record, we decline to dismiss the protest. A full-service electrical firm headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. ETS expands data center options for Arizona businesses with the launch of Private Cloud Hosting, Data Center Colocation and Disaster Recovery Services, all within a new Phoenix-based Tier 3 Data Center. For the same reasons outlined above, we find no merit to these assertions. Protest at 21-22 (challenging acceptable rating under configuration management ETA (B.2.2) based on SSEB’s assignment of two strengths and no weaknesses, and no risks) and 31‑33 (challenging acceptable rating under capacity management ETA (A.2.4) based on the number of evaluated strengths and lack of identified weaknesses). It is beyond dispute that AT&T’s proposal was considered by the agency to be superior in nearly every aspect. See AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 44. The solicitation identified eight specific criteria that an offeror’s model was to address. app. See PEC at 2; supra n.2 (defining an acceptable rating). Enterprise Services LLC E. Enterprise Services LLC CLAIM THIS BUSINESS. We believe in delivering industry-focused client services through technology and manufactured products. D, Letter from Meg Whitman to NSA, Oct. 24, 2017, at 1. Corp., B-410513, B‑410513.2, Dec. 31, 2014, 2015 CPD ¶ 21 at 4-5; Boeing Sikorsky Aircraft Support, B-277263.2, B-277263.3, Sept. 29, 1997, 97-2 CPD ¶ 91 at 15. These companies are located in 2508 Hwy 36 W GA, Crossville TN, Jackson GA, and Pikeville TN. For AT&T, the evaluators identified 11 major strengths, 65 strengths, and a single minor weakness, as well as 48 areas where the proposal met the requirements. at 6-8. Specifically, the evaluators assigned a good rating to ES’s proposal under the management factor’s facility management ETA (B.2.5), and a marginal rating under the transition and future state factor’s full operating capability management ETA (C.1.3). [11] The SEEB did not assign ES’s proposal an acceptable rating under two evaluation topic areas. [11]  See AR, Tab 6, SSEB Report for ES, at 4-94. Richard J. Conway, Esq., Merle M. DeLancey, Esq., Michael J. Slattery, Esq., Ioana Cristei, Esq., Philip E. Beshara, Esq., and Carolyn R. Cody-Jones, Esq., Blank Rome LLP, for the protester. H98230-15-R-0001, which was issued by the National Security Agency (NSA) for enterprise information technology services. ES also challenges the agency’s evaluation under the management factor’s collaboration and conflict resolution evaluation topic area. at 4. Business company ENTERPRISE SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS LLC is a legal entity registered under the law of State Nevada. In this respect, ES complains that the acceptable rating was improper because the RFP’s adjectival/risk rating definitions provided for an acceptable rating when strengths and weaknesses were offsetting. As a last matter, we briefly turn to ES’s vigorous argument that the agency could have, and should have, quantified the value of the competing proposals. at 10-12. Under this ETA, the agency assessed the degree to which the offeror’s proposal identified plans and processes for handling the replacement of non‑compliant equipment, as well as explained how periodic replacement of hardware, software, and firmware would be accomplished. which will provide additional reliability, redundancy, and reduced risk to contract performance, merit the higher price of the AT&T proposal. See NSA Req. We have considered all of the protester’s allegations and find that none provides a basis to sustain the protest. Following the initial evaluation, NSA conducted face-to-face discussions with each offeror in September 2016, and ES and AT&T submitted final proposals in December 2016. B, Excerpt of HPES Final Proposal, Dec. 19, 2016, at VI.A2-1. . 4, attach. at 43-44. Further, the combination of the non-price factors was more important than price. CLIENTS. Protest at 33-34. Acquiring Organization: My IT My IT is a managed service provider for IT services to small and mid-sized businesses.

Carbon Fiber Body Parts, Who Owns Spaulding Rehab, Chad Warden Coronavirus, Nike Meaning In Malayalam, Examples Of Cultural Context In Literature, Koblenz 2000 Psi Pressure Washer, 2020 Bmw X1 Oil Capacity, Wooden Door Threshold Strips, Mrcrayfish Gun Mod Reload Not Working, St Johns County Jail Commissary,